Category Archives: CPD for me

Training courses and events that I have attended recently.

2017 Gloucestershire Business Show

Yesterday, I spent a very long, but productive morning at the 2017 Gloucestershire Business Show, which was again held at Cheltenham Racecourse.  The car park was full, there were more exhibitors there and the different ‘zones’ appeared to have a real ‘buzz’ about them this year than in 2015 when I last attended.

It was lovely to see a few familiar faces, as well as be introduced to many new individuals or local companies/associations/organisations.  Although it is important to put everything in writing these days, you cannot beat meeting people face-to-face.  Half the battle when trying to coordinate initiatives is knowing who to deal with; days like these can provide you with that essential information and so save precious time.

I have a number of leads to pursue today, which will, hopefully, offer some future authoring and consultancy work.  Bringing local schools and business together can be hugely effective, as I have seen first-hand many times in the past.  Not only is the financial support welcomed by schools, particularly in light of the current budget cuts, but companies/associations/organisations also gain from the related publicity, both on- and offline. In addition, the community spirit that such projects often generate makes all the time and effort steering these events extremely gratifying.

The Education Show, Birmingham (16th to 18th March 2017)

Despite it being the Gold Cup at Cheltenham, a Friday and endless roadworks on the M5 with speed restrictions in place, my journeys to and from the NEC were bearable.

It was not Young Voices calling this time around, but The Education Show (http://www.education-show.com/)!  I try to visit annually or bi-annually to keep abreast with developments within the realm of education, attend keynote speakers sessions and meet individuals whom I have had contact with via e-mail, tweets, etc. (it is always lovely to be able to put a name to a face).

The NEC was heaving this year as there were three shows in the neighbouring atrium to The Education Show, plus the Big Bag event that numerous schools appeared to be attending judging by the amount of minibuses and coaches in the car park!  It threw me somewhat having to park and exit from the north side … usually I approach from the east side.  The shuttle buses were very frequent and soon took us to the exhibition halls, however.

Once inside, there was a real buzz.  It can be quite bewildering at first as the stands seem to go on forever.  Nevertheless, once you have viewed the floor plan and identified the zones that are most applicable to you, it does become more manageable.  I negotiated a good half of the exhibition before stopping for a well earned coffee break.  Not only did I seize some great offers on educational supplies (stocking up for private tutoring), but also spoke with several people manning stands that I felt might be relevant to my freelance consultancy and authoring work, e.g. British Council, Artsmark, Ministry of Defence schools, Jack Cherry.  It was also good to catch up with representatives from organisations that I have recently provided services for, e.g. Ed-Coms, Canada-UK Foundation.

What did strike me is how much emphasis is placed on maths/numeracy, English/literacy, SEND, online safety/technology and outdoor spaces.  Foundation subjects seemed somewhat marginalised … I think I only saw one stand linked to history!  Perhaps, a target for 2018 should be to have a greater range of exhibitors displaying their products/services?  Often, with so many budget cuts, it is foundation subject leaders that fail to gain the support that they require.  In my opinion, and this was also reinforced at a primary geography conference I attended a fortnight ago, achieving mastery in maths and English is far more effective when it has a clear purpose, e.g. links to a real-life situation/context that children are able to easily relate to.  There is still room for foundation subjects … after all, we should be aiming to deliver a broad and balanced curriculum in our schools.

Now, back at home, I must pursue leads that I have made and sift through the various leaflets/brochures that I have been given.

Be brave … it is worth the trip if you have yet to experience a show!

Online Safety Mark Accredited Assessor Update Training

A hugely intensive, but highly informative and very thought-provoking day.  Many thanks to Ron Richards, Ken Corish and Andrew Williams for sharing their endless knowledge, expertise and experiences so willingly.  Participants were also forthcoming in adding comments and providing feedback to the presenters throughout the event too, which was great.

My, along with many others’, log in to Skype for Business went smoothly, enabling the day to start on schedule.  Ron gave a formal welcome and introduction, whilst Andrew outlined the protocol, before providing updates on the 360 degree safe tool for schools, E-Safety Mark & Online Compass. Ron also elaborated on recent collaboration with NAACE concerning a joint E-Safety Mark/ICT Mark assessment and work that had been done with academy groups.  It was encouraging to learn that the E-Safety Mark will shortly be re-labelled as the Online Safety Mark, in line with changes within wider documentation, e.g. from the DfE, Ofsted and local safeguarding boards.

Next, Andrew expanded on the success that has been achieved in Wales regarding engagement with the 360 degree safe tool in particular.  The Welsh Government has shown a real commitment to online safety over the past two years.  Aspects of the Welsh Government Project were shared with us … examples of best practice that could easily be replicated in England, Scotland and Northern Ireland should the same financial backing and support be given from the government.  We must not become complacent … technology is constantly evolving and our behaviours are changing dramatically as a result.

Ron shared Professor Andy Phippen’s (based at the University of Plymouth) 360 data analysis with us.  His in-depth review of the data from 360 degree safe reviews gives an indication of online safety provision in schools across the UK.  His findings are clearly summed up by the following infographic:

Click on the image to enlarge it and discover more about Professor Andy Phippen’s findings.

Ken and Andrew’s combined presentation relating to online safety updates was incredibly well-delivered, interesting and insightful.  They discussed recent trends/developments, both from the UK Safer Internet Centre (UKSIC) and SWGfL’s perspectives.  Reference was made to the DfE’s documentation on Keeping Children Safe in Education (KCSIE) and Ofsted too.  Ken’s knowledge is endless … I really do not know how he manages to recall every minute detail as he does and keep abreast with technological developments!  Andrew’s background in schools prior to his online safety remit, alongside being a parent, means that he can truly empathise with the challenges Head Teachers, Senior Leaders, classroom teachers, etc. face.  Their session provoked many comments and raised several questions from the audience … it was difficult to keep up-to-date with the accompanying instant messenger feed!  As always, participants’ questions were answered honestly and confidently.

Before a much needed break for lunch, assessors were asked to access Padlet and use this tool to add comments about the current 360 degree safe content and template policies and give suggestions as to how 360 degree safe take-up/re-engagement might be increased.  Delegates had some valuable feedback to give here … now Ron, Ken and Andrew need to digest and debate these further.

A quick lunch was all that was allowed as there was plenty to still be covered during the afternoon.  Ken began by considering the evolution of the online safety message and changing age-related expectations.  This was very enlightening and thought-provoking … I have lots to share with those who have oversight of safeguarding and computing when conducting my next E-Safety Mark/Online Safety Mark assessment.

Andrew drew the short straw, being given the rather dry, although essential, topic of data protection to talk about.  Again, this was informative and gave much food for thought.  Andrew shared recent changes to EU data legislation and focused upon the implications that these have on how we manage what is often highly sensitive information on safeguarding issues. As time was tight, he identified the main changes and outlined how compliance and effective practice could be implemented.  The new 360 degree safe data tool from SWGfL was discussed in more detail too.

The team handed over to us for the final session of the day.  This involved the use of Padlet, the instant messenger facility and having the opportunity to be ‘handed’ the microphone to speak should we wish.  Firstly, we were asked to give feedback on any E-Safety Mark assessments that we had conducted, especially examples of good practice.  Prior to the event, we had been sent four E-Safety Mark reports that had been completed by different assessors. We were expected to read these and make notes on a feedback form, so that we were ready to voice our opinions. Whilst a degree of personal preference might need to be taken into account at this point, there were clearly certain requirements that must be met for a report to be deemed appropriate.  It was reassuring to know the reports I have generated have been of a very high standard!

Many thanks to the trio for a very worthwhile, engaging and reflective training day.  We did miss David Wright, of course … hope to see him again before too long.

Regional Primary Geography Conference (Contemporary Geography)

It was great to see the inspiring and engaging duo of David Weatherly and Jeff Stanfield once again for their annual roadshow (http://www.contemporarygeography.co.uk/contemporary_geography_training_opportunities.html).  Due to my strong links with schools and individuals across the county, I was invited by David and Jeff to attend today’s event … often, I am able to support them in their delivery of material by adding local snippets of information.

This year’s theme was ‘Developing mathematical fluency and language and literacy through geography‘, hugely relevant in light of the big focus on mastery, not only in maths, but now in many other areas of the curriculum.

The key aims were to:

  • demonstrate to colleagues how and why expertise in English and mathematics is vital in enabling high quality learning outcomes in geography.
  • design key question-led enquiries in geography, which integrate numeracy and mathematical fluency and language and literacy to enable children to perform better in geography.
  • ensure learning in geography, which connects with English and mathematics through the curriculum, is outcomes-focused and progressively challenging for children.
  • know how to plan effective assessment methods (beyond levels) matched to subject performance descriptors to identify achievement in learning connected to English and mathematics.

Following registration and the chance to grab some refreshments, David and Jeff introduced themselves and welcomed delegates, some of whom I had met before at previous conferences or they had been participants on CPD workshops that I have run locally; others were newcomers to the field of geography.

David began his session with reference to the historical master, Mercator, and his recognisable map projection.  He then went on to discuss real mastery and how we can teach it in geography. David emphasised that geography provides real life contexts for learning and applying literacy and numeracy.  He referred to National Currciulum links, as well as comments from Ofsted, e.g. evidence suggests that children do better in English, maths and geography when such an interconnected approach is undertaken.  David talked about the ‘flat-lined’ progress that is frequently seen between Years 3 and 6.  ‘Getting better’ is often linked to knowing more, but it is far more than this.  Mastery is not about the rote learning of information, but has three parts to it: teaching discrete facts and information; identifying concepts and applying/contextualisation.  We must ensure that we deliver a progressively challenging curriculum.

We had a short break for refreshments, which also provided the opportunity to chat briefly with other delegates, as well as David and Jeff.  Afterwards, Jeff took over, exemplifying good practice at Key Stage 1.  It was brilliant to see him ‘zoom in’ on Greenland and polar bears here, a topic that I have explored with youngsters this academic year, both in the classroom and via a Global Learning Programme (GLP) Key Stage 2 to Key Stage 3 transition project.  Jeff showcased the infamous ‘secret street detectives’ approach to enquiry, referred to Blooms taxonomy to ensure the shaping of outcome-driven learning objectives, highlighted that everything we do has an explicit link to geography and reinforced that written work is not always necessary; talking is good!  He led us through a scheme of work that he had recently produced, based on the well-loved book, ‘The Jolly Postman‘ by Janet and Allan Ahlberg and which addressed the theme ‘Our place, our locality‘.  This gave the opportunity for some ‘hands-on geography’ and further interaction among delegates.  As always, Jeff’s anecdotes were a pleasure to listen to and incorporated some live entertainment as well!

After a lovely lunch in the hotel’s airy dining room, we were certainly not allowed to slump! To begin with, David elaborated on the mastery approach and shared some very valuable tips with us. As teachers, we should plan by the outcome required.  We should not take a resource and then think what activities we could do with it.  All learning requires an activity, but not all activity constitutes learning – there must be an element of challenge and progression.  There must be no low-level activity as time is at a premium; instead, there needs to be rigour. He suggested that the mastery approach works well for boys as it is fast-paced, involves much verbal feedback and limited writing.  He quizzed us on how often we differentiate by gender; there are very few instances when we do this.  Girls frequently out-perform boys in schools because curriculum planning plays to their preferred style of learning.  Later, David demonstrated the mastery approach by talking us through an example of key question-led, enquiry-based learning, e.g. ‘How is India saving the tiger?‘  This was, undoubtedly, a fresh means of studying the country of India and very apt as it was the central theme for a Global Learning Programme (GLP) Key Stage 2 to Key Stage 3 transition project that I was due to deliver the following day!

A period of reflection and action planning was allocated to the final part of the conference. Unfortunately, I had to leave a few minutes before the end as I was tutoring after school. From my perspective, the day had enlightened me further about the mastery approach, inspired me to put it into action the next day when at Birdlip Primary School, provided new ways to explore India with youngsters and an innovative take for ‘secret street detectives’ enquiry work.

Thank you, David and Jeff, for inviting me today.  I hope that I did not ‘chip in’ too much!  Glad you liked the Arctic Alive (http://www.canadaukfoundation.org/arctic-alive/) and Wicked Weather Watch/Polar Ocean Challenge links (http://wickedweatherwatch.org.uk/ and http://polarocean.co.uk/).  Look forward to seeing you both again before too long.